Test-sequence engineering
Configured and verified against the delivered laboratory workflow and supported equipment.
EMC Test Automation Solutions
YAAN EMC test automation solutions combine workflow software, instrument integration and test-system engineering. The objective is to reduce repetitive operation while keeping safety controls, traceable data and laboratory review visible throughout the test.
Sequence status
Radiated immunity workflow
Frequency
— MHz
Forward Power
— W
Field Level
— V/m
Interface preview
The animated interface illustrates the workflow; the same functionality is listed in HTML below and does not depend on JavaScript or WebGL.
Software functions
Functions are configured to the instruments, interfaces and methods agreed for a deployment.
Configured and verified against the delivered laboratory workflow and supported equipment.
Configured and verified against the delivered laboratory workflow and supported equipment.
Configured and verified against the delivered laboratory workflow and supported equipment.
Configured and verified against the delivered laboratory workflow and supported equipment.
Configured and verified against the delivered laboratory workflow and supported equipment.
Configured and verified against the delivered laboratory workflow and supported equipment.
An automation project starts with the laboratory procedure and equipment inventory. YAAN maps steps, interfaces, measurements, decisions and safety conditions into a system design. The result is configured for the actual instruments and process rather than relying on a generic test script.
The software coordinates instrument drivers, calibration data, test-point logic, result storage and user interaction. Hardware interlocks and equipment protections operate at the appropriate system layer; software status adds visibility but should not replace independent safety functions where they are required.
Frequency sweeps, level searches, repeated setup commands, result logging and report preparation are strong candidates for automation. EUT setup, anomaly assessment, troubleshooting and compliance decisions continue to require qualified laboratory personnel.
Deployment can include interface validation, instrument-driver configuration, sequence templates, data mapping, operator training and acceptance checks against agreed workflows. Scope and supported methods are documented for the delivered system.
Software specifications are deployment-specific. The following fields are confirmed during requirements review rather than populated with assumed compatibility.
Direct answers
Clear technical answers based on common laboratory and product-selection questions.
A solution can include workflow software, configured instrument drivers, test-sequence templates, calibration-data handling, equipment status, result storage and reporting integration. It may also coordinate hardware such as generators, amplifiers, probes, receivers and switches. The delivered scope depends on the laboratory’s methods, equipment and safety architecture.
Often, yes, when the equipment provides a documented communication interface and a suitable driver can be implemented or configured. A compatibility review checks model, firmware, interface, command behavior, timing and safety requirements. Instruments without remote control may remain manual checkpoints within an otherwise automated workflow.
No. Automation handles repeatable commands, sequencing and data capture, but qualified personnel remain responsible for correct setup, applicable requirements, safety, EUT monitoring, anomaly investigation and interpretation. A good system makes engineering decisions more visible and consistent rather than hiding them behind an unattended process.
Continue exploring
Provide your test procedure, instrument inventory, interface details and desired result workflow for a compatibility and scope review.